Search the Community

The judge scoring system and the in-game commentary, IS VERY DUMB AND ONE-SIDED I was reading a ToTT, Fighter B had FIghter A on the ground and in top control for almost 4 minutes of the second round, Fighter A was able to force a referee standup and landed some good shots, then after the round ended, the commentators said that Fighter A "dominated that round" I understand the judges being idiots sometimes but the commentators as well? In no way did Fighter A deserve the round but both the commentators, all three judges, and the games fight engine thought he did... If Mike or anybody would like me to send them the official "Scoring Criteria" That is Universally recognized as the way a mma fight is meant to be judged, I have it downloaded.. Literally, if 4 of the 5 minutes were spent on the ground, with one person dominating the entire time and maintaining top control... NOTHING that happened on the feet matters, unless someone had gotten rocked or dropped at the very end of the round and even then that only matters sometimes to some judges, fighter A had been completely dominated, regardless of what this game thinks.

http://www.mmatycoon...<br /><br />cage control. ur deciding where the (dictating) fight takes place. and effective grappling. thats kinda important in scoring. no punches no kicks no strikes landed by opponent. 2 of 60 takedown attempts by opponents. 1 punch and one advance position by me. not much so he definitely scored more with the successful attempts. cant argue that one. but idk if he deserved a victory in this one. http://oi44.tinypic.com/2l9gm7q.jpg