Search the Community

http://www.mmatycoon.com/gallery/0/1348615721oompa.jpg Vs We don't have a photo of this bum p4p 15 - 19-3-0 (6 via KO, 6 via Sub) p4p 23 - 34-16-2 (12 via KO, 10 via sub) The new king of the featherweights, everyone favourite orange guy, the one and only Little Man Oompa Loompa will be travelling to London for a Superfight against the 2nd ranked featherweight Kauko Partio. We did see through the week that Loompa wanted Otso, he along with Stu Pidasol's camp started an online campaign to get the fight happening with the #Otsoisabitch. To add an extra layer we saw the emergence of a love triangle with Richard Dawkins and Loompa having a war of words via twitter. So here we are 2 days out from a fight, we don't have Loompa vs Otso and we don't have Loompa Vs Dawkins, we have Loompa Vs Partio and you, much like me are asking who the fuck is Partio. Well after a quick glance he fell on his arse at the number 2 ranking with a win against Clint Lomax. Prior to that he had done fuck all. Do you have any thoughts on the fight Loompa? Loompa: Well this fight does nothing for me, this guy's a bum, I thought I had finished fighting bums when I moved to Evo but Mega Jug said I need to fight him, so fight him I will. At least I get the chance to knock his pathetic arse back down the rankings where he belongs. That's a serious lack of respect for a guy that has all the tools to beat you Loompa, he has beaten Lomax last fight who is rated as one of the best ever at this weight division. Loompa: Yeah and? He's spent his whole career hiding at Cage Wars, he's lost to both Power and Randolph the 2 guys I have just beaten. Lomax is a bum and so is this Partyo, Partio or whatever the fuck the stupid c-unts name is. Are you in a bad mood today Loompa? I haven't seen you this angry during an interview before? Loompa: Yeah maybe I am, probably coming down, partied all night with the lads and this new kid Stu has been training Jordan "The Wolf" Belfort, the kid's a fucking lunatic more money than sense but fuck it was one hell of a wild party. Oh, I see I will leave you too it..

Hello. I searched and was not able to find anything, so hopefully I am not asking a question that has already been answered on here. I understand how pops work with regards to how skills display on a fighter profile page, BJJ belts, etc. What I am wondering is, do the actual points behind the scenes also have an impact? In other words, would the game give different results for a person with 51 wrestling than a person with 59 wrestling? Or say, someone with 4-- takedown defense versus 4++ takedown defense? Just wondering, so if anyone has any of insight it would be great. Thanks!

Good evening, I apologize if this is somewhere on here. I did a quick search and did not see it, but by all means if it's in a thread or on the Wiki somewhere, I'd be glad to read there. Anyhow, my question involves secondary skills and how they relate to their associated primaries. I realize this might not exactly correlate for things such as clinchwork and striking defense, but I'll try to keep it more basic in asking my question. I think my question will be best asked via examples: If the opponent they all face is the same individual, which of the following fighters would have the best success taking him down: - The fighter with 15 (elite) wrestling and 1 (abysmal) takedown offense - The fighter with 8 wrestling and 8 takedown offense - Or the fighter with 1 wrestling, and 15 takedown offense. Or similarly, which fighter would throw better elbows? - 15 MT, 1 elbows - 8 MT, 8 elbows (I suddenly wonder if octopi have elbows) - 1 MT, 15 elbows To ask in more general terms, to be successful at a specific secondary skill in a fight, is it better to have strength in the secondary, it's associate primary, or is it a balance between both (and if so, is it even)? In a sense, I would almost think it would make sense that it were the even balance, and that the success would be some formula involving a product of the 2 (so the first and last example above would be even at 15, while the second fighter would be over four times better at 64). Rather than randomly speculate, if anyone can clarify this, I'd be most appreciative. Thanks!