MrClean Posted May 2, 2014 Report Share Posted May 2, 2014 The manager record is a meaningless statistic. It shows the total wins, losses, and draws of fighters on a managers roster. It shows those wins, losses, and draws even if the fighter was manged by another manager when they occured. I can't think of any reason to even look at the statistic. It can be very misleading. I just look at the historic record. So what is the purpose of this post? 1- I was looking at the HOF and realized the records are all wrong. I would like to see the record replaced with the historic record on the HOF page. When I look at the great managers I want to see their body of work to see how they compare with eachother and how mine compares with theirs. 2- It would be better if the record on the manager page only reflected the fights that were managed by that manager. 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tp61503 Posted May 2, 2014 Report Share Posted May 2, 2014 i was looking at this some time ago and i agree 100% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 3, 2014 Report Share Posted May 3, 2014 Agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grasman Posted May 3, 2014 Report Share Posted May 3, 2014 The only record that means anything is the historical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thb Posted May 3, 2014 Report Share Posted May 3, 2014 the manager record is indeed completely useless Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minark Posted May 3, 2014 Report Share Posted May 3, 2014 I wouldn't mind getting rid of it . I never even look at it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markyosullivan Posted May 3, 2014 Report Share Posted May 3, 2014 I agree with everyone else. I'd rather see the historical manager record as the manager record and remove the old manager record. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts