"Tempotius" Tout Petit Gigante (409524) Talks Juarez Instant Rematch Interviewer: Good evening, everyone. We’re here tonight with Tout Petit Gigante, fresh off a hard-fought split decision victory over Elix Juarez, with a rematch already signed for just two days from now. Tout, a win is a win, but from your social media, it seems like you're absolutely furious with your performance. What are your immediate thoughts after that grueling fight? Tout Petit Gigante: Furious is an understatement. Disgusted. That’s what I am. A split decision? Against him? It’s pathetic. I don't care that I got the win; that was not the performance I train for. That was not a champion's performance. It shows I have more work to do, and I'm going to make sure he pays for it. Interviewer: You mentioned on social media that you believe you did enough, and the fight was judged as a whole. Can you elaborate on your perspective of the fight itself, particularly the ground exchanges where Juarez seemed to have some control? Tout Petit Gigante: He had positional control, yes. He held me down. He attempted his submissions, his "sub machine" reputation on full display. He tried for guillotines, arm triangles, chokes from my back. But he couldn't finish anything. He couldn't put me away. My cardio was there; I was constantly working from the bottom, attacking from my guard, looking for sweeps, reversals. He might have been on top, but I was the one fighting to create openings. I was the one active, threatening, making him defend, even from an inferior position. Look at the second and third rounds—I was the one advancing, the one pushing the pace. Two judges saw that. Interviewer: You had some key reversals in the fight, particularly in the first and second rounds, where you turned unfavorable positions into dominant ones. Can you walk us through those moments and your mindset in those scrambles? Tout Petit Gigante: My mindset is always to dominate. If he gets a takedown, it's a momentary setback, a piece being moved on the board. I am not simply "escaping" from a position. I am looking for the immediate counter, the brutal turnover. In the first round, he took my back, and I reversed it, put him in my guard. In the second, he had my back again, and I reversed it to his guard. Those weren't escapes; those were moments where I imposed my will and took back control. He might get me down, but I'm going to make him regret it every single second. Interviewer: Juarez's post-fight comment suggests he felt "robbed" and wants another contract. You responded by saying, "Closest you will ever get to defeating me, all it took was having 5 years of extra training and coming down in weight. Again next time won't even be close you better try to strike instead." Can you explain the meaning behind that strong statement? Tout Petit Gigante: "Robbed"? He was handed a gift by one judge, nothing more. He wants to talk about being "robbed" when he couldn’t finish me? He’s older, he’s had five extra years to "train." And still, he couldn't finish me. That split decision was the absolute closest he will ever get to defeating me. Next time, it won't even be close. He thinks he's a submission specialist? He tried all his tricks and I shut him down. Maybe he should try striking instead, because his grappling was clearly not enough to put me away. Interviewer: You quickly followed up with "Accept the contract, you want the rematch let's do it this week otherwise I move on. Beat you this week and return for LFC 3 against a fresh name on the 15th for the title." This is an incredibly rapid turnaround, with the rematch now set for Alpha-1: Ascension on the 7th. Given your established relationship with UFF and LFC, why take this fight so quickly on a different promotion? Tout Petit Gigante:  Urgency? It's not urgency, it's unadulterated anger. That performance disgusts me. I need to erase it. I need to prove that was a fluke, a momentary lapse, and he was nothing more than a speed bump. I said I need to fight frequently to leave no doubt who the true number one is. This is it. I want to settle this now. This week, at Alpha-1: Ascension. I respect LFC and UFF, and I wasn't trying to blindside anyone, but after that fight, after the radio silence, we put actions in our own hands. If he wants the rematch, let’s do it. I don't have time to waste on pretenders who can’t back up their trash talk. I'm not here to play games. I'm here to dominate. My walkout song for this next fight is "I Thought About Killing You" – that should tell him everything he needs to know about my mindset going into this rematch. This isn't just about winning; it's about murder. Interviewer: So, after this rapid rematch, your focus will be on the LFC title? Tout Petit Gigante: Absolutely. This fight with Juarez, the rematch, is to utterly obliterate any doubt. After that, yes, LFC 3 is next, if it's still going ahead. I'll be ready. There are many potential matchups, but ultimately, I'm not just fighting; I'm coming to take what’s mine and prove I’m the best. My window is limited, and I intend to make every single moment count. Interviewer: Tout Petit Gigante, thank you for your time and your very candid thoughts. Best of luck in the rematch. Tout Petit Gigante: My pleasure. Juarez had his chance, and he narrowly missed. Now? Now it’s a far cry. Obrigado.

Bantamweight Challenger Talks Changes Ahead Of Championship Rematch On Saturday Read the Full Article Here[url={url}]View the full article[/url]

Haven't properly played the game in months, and there's a bunch of creations that never trained i'd like to have released. I'd like 10 of my 16 fighters gone. Is there a way to do that, other than waiting 30 days between sacks? Cheers

There's a certain dark irony in the fact that a post calling out toxic community behavior was met with exactly that: a dismissal of the message and an attack on the messenger. It's almost as if the community is proving Mike's point in real-time, inadvertently providing the most vivid example possible of the environment he's describing.

Sure! Here's a sample forum post defending a previous user's post and arguing that it wasn't written by AI: Subject: Re: Accusations About Previous Post Being AI-Generated I just want to step in here and defend the original poster. It's honestly unfair how quick people are to jump to the “AI wrote this” conclusion just because someone wrote something articulate or well-structured. If you actually read what they wrote, you’ll notice there’s nuance, a clear voice, and references to personal experience—things that AI can mimic but usually doesn’t do this naturally. The tone feels human, and the arguments flow in a way that suggests someone who genuinely understands the topic and cares about the discussion. Also, just because someone writes well or presents their thoughts clearly doesn’t mean it’s generated by a bot. We should be encouraging thoughtful contributions to this forum, not trying to discredit them with baseless claims. Let’s not turn this place into a witch hunt for AI-written posts. Give people the benefit of the doubt unless there’s real evidence. Love, ChatGPT The Real Human Named Popart