Guest Posted December 5, 2010 Report Share Posted December 5, 2010 I can tell from some of the pixels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manfred Posted December 5, 2010 Report Share Posted December 5, 2010 LOL at JMFCs questioning our quality. Irregardless, your 160 came out after ours, so you didn't have it at awards time last year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 5, 2010 Report Share Posted December 5, 2010 Come on now. Even HB didn't have 160 until Feb. Thread My bad, it was 159 for 20 dollars (which seemed to upset everyone else). I stand corrected. Irrespective of this DIDM saying everyone had everything better than us is a lot of crap considering our top tier have consistantly matched any other alliance on a business level. Also Leo Barros has nothing to do with us and never has, although I kinda liked his quirkiness/crazy dedication. Edit: In any case this little commity people are putting together will hopefully fall flat as its a stupidly elitist idea, especially considering some are trying to exclude us on the ground of you dont like us even though we have been in this game as long as most of you and have achieved as much or more than a lot of you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 5, 2010 Report Share Posted December 5, 2010 This thread is starting to make my man bits tingle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 5, 2010 Report Share Posted December 5, 2010 This Leo talk reminds me. MMABR should be an option for alliance of the year. I think most of us can agree that they had great impact on the game this year. Yes? Id agree. Changed the landscape of the game significantly, just like ourselves last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 5, 2010 Report Share Posted December 5, 2010 Id agree. Changed the landscape of the game significantly, just like ourselves last year. They were definitely the most talked about alliance, as well as the biggest. I'd say they deserve to be a part of the contest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manfred Posted December 5, 2010 Report Share Posted December 5, 2010 ......considering some are trying to exclude us on the ground of you dont like us even though we have been in this game as long as most of you and have achieved as much or more than a lot of you. Purposely leaving out members from my own alliance, b/c obviously I think most are good choices, my list would include: ............ Tapeleg - Like it or not DIDM, JMFC is an important and large part of the game community ................... I agree JMFC should be a part, I've said so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 5, 2010 Report Share Posted December 5, 2010 LOL at JMFCs questioning our quality. When it's a real 160 there is an exclamation mark. Nice scam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 5, 2010 Report Share Posted December 5, 2010 Glad I gt here at the end of the year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simonmoon Posted December 5, 2010 Report Share Posted December 5, 2010 How about this as an idea. Everyone is afraid that if we let everyone vote JMFC is going to win Alliance of the Year again. Right? So how about we just say that people can't vote for their own Alliance, their own fighter, their own company, or themselves as manager. That way no one in JMFC can vote for JMFC as Alliance of the Year (even though we clearly are, of course). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 5, 2010 Report Share Posted December 5, 2010 How about this as an idea. Everyone is afraid that if we let everyone vote JMFC is going to win Alliance of the Year again. Right? So how about we just say that people can't vote for their own Alliance, their own fighter, their own company, or themselves as manager. That way no one in JMFC can vote for JMFC as Alliance of the Year (even though we clearly are, of course). i believe we did that last year a multi accounts were made to change that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rambo Posted December 6, 2010 Report Share Posted December 6, 2010 I thought we got rid of all the multiple accounts? Or is there something you guys are doing that the rest of us dont know about? Any group of judges is going fall victim to the same circlejerking and penis stroking that goes on in chat and this alone is why its a terrible idea. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 6, 2010 Report Share Posted December 6, 2010 i got a sparkly belt so i win Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rambo Posted December 6, 2010 Report Share Posted December 6, 2010 How about this as an idea. Everyone is afraid that if we let everyone vote JMFC is going to win Alliance of the Year again. Right? So how about we just say that people can't vote for their own Alliance, their own fighter, their own company, or themselves as manager. That way no one in JMFC can vote for JMFC as Alliance of the Year (even though we clearly are, of course). I don't care about the alliance of the year votes from all the JMFC members. Everybody knows Convicted Inc is the best alliance in the game. We've owned the winning percentage since winning percentage was invented. Let's face it, sitting #1 at the top of the winning percentage list for about 2 years straight now, is quite the accomplishment. And we don't have no duckers in our alliance (I'm sure maybe a few fight offers have been declined). But that's irrelevant, the voting needs a panel to simplify things and not let people vote multiple times. Because like it or not, there's people out there scamming the system with multiple, perhaps dozens, of accounts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PBR Posted December 6, 2010 Report Share Posted December 6, 2010 That proof screenshot looks shopped... hell balls had the first 160 -- it was verified by mike cause when it showed up as 160 mike was pm'ed about it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 6, 2010 Report Share Posted December 6, 2010 there were at least 5 alliances that were more established, and had better EVERYTHING they offered, but you tools had 80 some members, so voting was just a little off so they say That's both wrong and has nothing to do with what you quoted. Well done! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blindsided Posted December 6, 2010 Report Share Posted December 6, 2010 Ahh I mistook JMFC for MMABR. That is my fault. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manfred Posted December 6, 2010 Report Share Posted December 6, 2010 hell balls had the first 160 -- it was verified by mike cause when it showed up as 160 mike was pm'ed about it Not only did Mike verify it, but Roy gave out samples for testing vs. 159 and even hired people so they could see for themselves. Yet despite all this, you want to call ours fake. Sad, I wasn't even questioning your, just the timing. Real classy, boys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 6, 2010 Report Share Posted December 6, 2010 Roy's 160 was the first one i remember...and proofed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simonmoon Posted December 6, 2010 Report Share Posted December 6, 2010 Not only did Mike verify it, but Roy gave out samples for testing vs. 159 and even hired people so they could see for themselves. Yet despite all this, you want to call ours fake. Sad, I wasn't even questioning your, just the timing. Real classy, boys. He was joking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 6, 2010 Report Share Posted December 6, 2010 To get this thing back on topic..........I think the panel should be no more then 6 people. Obviously Mike Tycoon would be one of the guys on the panel. To be honest, if Mike is on the panel, I think the other members on the panel would take it serious no matter how they act in the forums. So my panel would look like this Mike Tycoon Cardiff DIDM Matty Blayze Greywar Shiv Again, all of this is just my opinion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simonmoon Posted December 6, 2010 Report Share Posted December 6, 2010 Obviously Mike Tycoon would be one of the guys on the panel. The only thing that is obvious at this point is that we're not going to come to any sort of consensus, and end of year awards aren't going to happen unless Mike, or someone Mike picks, decides how it's going to happen. No one else has the authority to decide which of these limitless options will happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 6, 2010 Report Share Posted December 6, 2010 The only thing that is obvious at this point is that we're not going to come to any sort of consensus, and end of year awards aren't going to happen unless Mike, or someone Mike picks, decides how it's going to happen. No one else has the authority to decide which of these limitless options will happen. i agree, i tried posting award ideas as suggested by someone in this thread and the post were closed http://www.mmatycoon.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=19095 so who has the answers as to what is going on with awards? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 6, 2010 Report Share Posted December 6, 2010 so who has the answers as to what is going on with awards? I wish we could get these answers sooner rather then later. I know we would all like to see the nominees for any of the awards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardiffWanderer Posted December 6, 2010 Report Share Posted December 6, 2010 I wish we could get these answers sooner rather then later. I know we would all like to see the nominees for any of the awards. One thing that will happen is within the next couple of days there will be clear movement on the subject. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts