Popular Post Guest Posted August 23, 2014 Popular Post Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 I think instead of managers straight up declining, i think the should have the ability to send a counter offer of what they would need to sign. from there the owner chooses to accept his counter offer, send another counter offer, or decline his counter offer and end negotiations. just a thought. EDIT: Been thinking about this in the past hour or so, I've owned an org before and this would do my head in, how about when sending the contract offer you can tick a non negotiable box?Therefore when signing lower ranked fighters you don't have to worry about counter offers anymore then you do at the moment - but if it's a high profile fighter and it makes sense to try and strike together any deal possible then you can add the negotiate variable? for those who where thinking that people would just send counter offers to send them, this is a good idea. another one is a final offer button for when your in negotiation and want to wrap it up. 21 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caleb613 Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 Interesting but how would it work precisely? Say: initial offer 2000/2000/2000 - 4 fights Counter 4000/4000/4000 - 2 fights :comment box: I don't want to sign a long contract And then the org owner has the option to accept the counter or decline right? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 Interesting but how would it work precisely? Say: initial offer 2000/2000/2000 - 4 fights Counter 4000/4000/4000 - 2 fights :comment box: I don't want to sign a long contract And then the org owner has the option to accept the counter or decline right? yep. he also has the option to send a third counter offer Example 3000/3000/3000 -2 fight :comment box: okay i can do that many fights but not for the price suggested, how about we meet in the middle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 +1 As a manager i would love to negotiate (counter) an offer if i think my fighter deserves more...BUT...Think about the headache the org owner will have managing 100 fighters and 75 of them making counters. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scooby Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 Yeah, it seemed like a good idea at first, i even +1'd the post and then i thought about the fact that now people will probably counter just to do so and it will be a stupid stressful game between org owner and manager trying to sign EACH of his orgs fighters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caleb613 Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 Been thinking about this in the past hour or so, I've owned an org before and this would do my head in, how about when sending the contract offer you can tick a non negotiable box? Therefore when signing lower ranked fighters you don't have to worry about counter offers anymore then you do at the moment - but if it's a high profile fighter and it makes sense to try and strike together any deal possible then you can add the negotiate variable? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 Been thinking about this in the past hour or so, I've owned an org before and this would do my head in, how about when sending the contract offer you can tick a non negotiable box? Therefore when signing lower ranked fighters you don't have to worry about counter offers anymore then you do at the moment - but if it's a high profile fighter and it makes sense to try and strike together any deal possible then you can add the negotiate variable? that's exactly what i was thinking. i was just about to say add in a box that say final offer but i think both would work. you could have a non-negotiable box and you could also have a final offer box where if you are going back and forth you can just send in a final offer that they have to take or leave. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GBK16 Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 Like the idea, and the other counter arguements to it are valid also. This idea would be great with a few alterations to ensure it also doesn't cause any major problems. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddennis2 Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 Seems like a good idea and it would make the game more fun. I would love to tell the organizations how much I think my fighters are instead of vice versa 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.J Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 yeah that would be helpful if implemented. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 Great idea with the "non negotiable" box! 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madbob Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 this would be a great addition to the orgs and there owners, especially with the non negotiable box. great improvement, got a +1 i was like great idea -> heartless and scooby post , oh yeah right hmmmm (not so great anymore) -> the check box ( idea saved ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolf Posted August 24, 2014 Report Share Posted August 24, 2014 You just have to make an.offer they cant refuse 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 25, 2014 Report Share Posted August 25, 2014 We should be making orgs easier to run, not more difficult. Many great org owners eventually close up shop because it is simply too time consuming. This would make it much, much worse. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 26, 2014 Report Share Posted August 26, 2014 If the manager wants to change the details he can simply not do anything and at the same time tell the org owner what are his demands. If the org owner agrees to this he''ll send a new contract, if not, he won't and the manager can still accept or let him sit there. A lot of times I get contracts rejected saying they want less fights or more money and then I send a new offer and everything is fine. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 26, 2014 Report Share Posted August 26, 2014 also, this only makes sense for rich orgs. young orgs(low mid tier) can't afford to have their signing bonuses on hold while there is this back and forth. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 26, 2014 Report Share Posted August 26, 2014 also, this only makes sense for rich orgs. young orgs(low mid tier) can't afford to have their signing bonuses on hold while there is this back and forth. Yup, this idea only sounds like a good idea if you have never run an org before. It ties up money, and it also creates much more tedious work, which orgs already have too much of. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 26, 2014 Report Share Posted August 26, 2014 Yup, this idea only sounds like a good idea if you have never run an org before. It ties up money, and it also creates much more tedious work, which orgs already have too much of. Yup, this idea only sounds like a good idea if you have never run an org before. It ties up money, and it also creates much more tedious work, which orgs already have too much of. well funny thing is..... im currently running an org and i have run somewhat successful ones before. as stated in a future post and in my edit there should be a non-negotiable box. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 26, 2014 Report Share Posted August 26, 2014 also, this only makes sense for rich orgs. young orgs(low mid tier) can't afford to have their signing bonuses on hold while there is this back and forth. see post above for why this is not completely true. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scooby Posted August 28, 2014 Report Share Posted August 28, 2014 Damn man, everyone in this thread got negs lol i dont think ive ever seen GBK with a neg 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 28, 2014 Report Share Posted August 28, 2014 Damn man, everyone in this thread got negs lol i dont think ive ever seen GBK with a neg I think the new humors multi (KingJames) is trolling around giving everyone -1s. Don't worry. He'll be banned soon enough. In the meantime, let's just +1 each other and negate his trolling. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GianBarGian Posted July 25, 2015 Report Share Posted July 25, 2015 +1 good idea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shards Posted July 30, 2015 Report Share Posted July 30, 2015 I'm not against the idea of counter offers, but if this gets added every contract I send will be non-negotiable since this just seems like an extra added something I don't want to deal with. The game already has its own built in system for counter offers, send a private message to the org owner and talk there. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teyoken Posted July 2, 2022 Report Share Posted July 2, 2022 On 8/22/2014 at 8:16 PM, Caleb613 said: Interesting but how would it work precisely? Say: initial offer 2000/2000/2000 - 4 fights Counter 4000/4000/4000 - 2 fights :comment box: I don't want to sign a long contract And then the org owner has the option to accept the counter or decline right? Another feature that would be useful. cut out mailing back and forth and resending offers Jesus why weren’t some of these great suggestions ever programmed. It’s the little things that matter! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts