Guest Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 This is definately a war thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 This is definately a war thread. i brought the finger guns Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 you do realize that the girls in the pics/vids/gifs did so on their own accord, right? that they weren't forced to pose? most of them enjoy the attention, which is the reason they do it, and there's no wrong in appreciating the female form. Oh man. Just say that you don't care. Don't make it sound noble. Appreciating the female form Yes, so do I. As far as I know I didn't say anything about girls chosing to pose that way. The problem is that those women are able to find refuge in sexual objectification as a form of empowerment in the first place. You are turning cause and effect. Some girls benefit from it, sure. The ones who are pretty and either have no sense of self worth or don't care. I don't see how that makes it right. Now I sound like feminist. I wouldn't have said anything about those avatars if it wasn't for this thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 and boom goes the dynamite Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 and boom goes the dynamite Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j666 Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Oh man. Just say that you don't care. Don't make it sound noble. Appreciating the female form Yes, so do I. As far as I know I didn't say anything about girls chosing to pose that way. The problem is that those women are able to find refuge in sexual objectification as a form of empowerment in the first place. You are turning cause and effect. Some girls benefit from it, sure. The ones who are pretty and either have no sense of self worth or don't care. I don't see how that makes it right. Now I sound like feminist. I wouldn't have said anything about those avatars if it wasn't for this thread. lol steeve. i agree that a lot people prolly wouldn't have said anything had it not been for this thread...myself included, hahaha by calling urself a feminist, you solidified ur status as a man. lolz...cuz feminists are just women trying to be men. hahaha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iloveme8 Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Oh man. Just say that you don't care. Don't make it sound noble. Appreciating the female form Yes, so do I. As far as I know I didn't say anything about girls chosing to pose that way. The problem is that those women are able to find refuge in sexual objectification as a form of empowerment in the first place. You are turning cause and effect. Some girls benefit from it, sure. The ones who are pretty and either have no sense of self worth or don't care. I don't see how that makes it right. Now I sound like feminist. I wouldn't have said anything about those avatars if it wasn't for this thread. You say it like there's something inherently wrong with sexual objectification. If everyone agrees to it, no harm done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 You say it like there's something inherently wrong with sexual objectification. Hallelujah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
overthetop2 Posted December 11, 2009 Report Share Posted December 11, 2009 You are the guy that doesn't come on the forum anymore because there are too many trolls right? It doesn't supprise me that there are people who are offended by those avatars. This game is open to all ages and sexes. I also have a sister which makes me look different at that stuff. If I had a 12 year old son I wouldn't feel comfortable with him seeing those pictures either. A picture of a girl mastrubating with her clothes on is a step too far imo. If people are not able to draw a line than they shouldn't be allowed at all. Darnok wrong. Steeve right. And finally people with dirty av's should go to a porn forum and take their shat over there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 11, 2009 Report Share Posted December 11, 2009 Darnok wrong. Steeve right. And finally people with dirty av's should go to a porn forum and take their shat over there. I hope Steeves children and your children are not allowed to watch tv. There are stereotypes in nearly every show. Same thing for most of the journals, especially those for junger people. Same thing for any form of advertisement. Same thing for any media! You are here and worry about children who could be able to see inappropriate stimuli. THIS IS A MMA-PAGE, everything that happens here is not useful for kids! Id prefere to protect my kids from seeing violence than seeing porn. If you say, that a kid can tell the difference between violent behaviour in a sport like mma and violent behaviour in generel, why shouldn't the same kid be able to tell the difference between Porn-Girls and Real-Life-Girls. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
overthetop2 Posted December 11, 2009 Report Share Posted December 11, 2009 I disagree. Porn is worse than Violence. Might i remind you of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles being a kids show? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 11, 2009 Report Share Posted December 11, 2009 I disagree. Porn is worse than Violence. Might i remind you of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles being a kids show? I agree. Violent porn is better than Cheerios. Might i remind you that American Ninja influenced chilluns much more than these turtles of which you speak? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 11, 2009 Report Share Posted December 11, 2009 The thought of my unborn children watching MTV makes the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. No, I would not allow them to watch television. They would read books, play piano and make paintings. I don't have a television or children and if I did they would never meet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 11, 2009 Report Share Posted December 11, 2009 I disagree. Porn is worse than Violence. Might i remind you of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles being a kids show? Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles to mma is like SailorMoon to Gina Wild to Steeve: You wont be able to protect your kids from all the bad influences out there. Dont you think it would make more sence to talk about "influences" with your kids, than trying to hide them? (ofc we need a reliable kids-age to do this; i would also try to protect them at any costs before the age is reached) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iloveme8 Posted December 11, 2009 Report Share Posted December 11, 2009 I agree. Violent porn is better than Cheerios. And with that said, this is now the greatest thread ever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 11, 2009 Report Share Posted December 11, 2009 Boobs are also sexist. If you want girls to LIKE YOU, you don't look at porn. HAHAHAHAHA This is the best thing I have ever read. Hey whats it like living in a Fundamentalist Christian Fairy Tale Land? I bet it's totally awesome and boner-free. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 11, 2009 Report Share Posted December 11, 2009 To argue that you are all crap of course I know this is 2 pages back but, reality check master debater, you aren't "arguing" anything, you're just spouting nonsense along with your narrow minded opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 11, 2009 Report Share Posted December 11, 2009 You got a mom? Women don't have to be half nude to be appreciated There is a difference between appreciating women and sexually objectifying them. Everybody his cup of tea, but I wonder how you are going to look at it when your girl starts dating. I bet you don't want boys to appreciate her in that way. I'm maybe too paranoia because I never liked any of my sisters boyfriends. Jesus people like you are unbelievable. Turn it off, avoid it, ensure those you don't want to see it - don't see it and beyond that shut the hell up about it. I'm sure that for you your White Knighting Disney Fairy Tale belief system in the sanctity of feminine honor is fantabulous, the rest of us don't want to hear it. Those of us that think ass and tits are awesome will keep the avatars on and ogle them till our hearts are content. You, the Mormons, Fundies and other White Knighting goofus and gallants can turn em off and continue to believe we are living in the Dark Ages. Cripes. Sorry for the triple post but jeez, some peoples prudish and absurd "THINK OF THE CHILDREN THINK OF THE CHILDREN" mentality drives me bugshit crazy. p.s. Change you better know who the ass in your sig belongs to and tell me, or there WILL be repercussions! I vote those with hot avatars must divulge who the yummy bits belong too, you know, for research purposes ... for science! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 Firstly, I'm not a Jesus people or a mormon. Secondly, what are you babbling about? Calm it down champ and go easy on the stereotypes. Not everybody who disagrees with you is conspiring to destroy the world. So if you are against sexual objectification than you live in a Fundamentalist White Knighting Christian Disney Fairy Tale Land. Hahaha. Priceless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 Firstly, I'm not a Jesus people or a mormon. Secondly, what are you babbling about? Calm it down champ and go easy on the stereotypes. Not everybody who disagrees with you is conspiring to destroy the world. So if you are against sexual objectification than you live in a Fundamentalist White Knighting Christian Disney Fairy Tale Land. Hahaha. Priceless. "Your" interpretation and opinion on what objectification is, is what I take issue with. My wife's best friend thinks the same way you do. I would bet cold hard cash that she will be divorced inside 5 years. Living in this fantasy world where men should be ashamed of lusting after beautiful women and portrayals of beautiful women is ludicrous and unrealistic. She is the kind of person that believes watching porn is exactly the same as infidelity. And be careful where you are throwing accusations of stereotyping. It doesn't fly coming from someone who is implying people who watch, condone or display provocative images are sexist or misogynistic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 And be careful where you are throwing accusations of stereotyping. It doesn't fly coming from someone who is implying people who watch, condone or display provocative images are sexist or misogynistic.You are a little paranoia aren't you? I never called anybody misogynistic. I would also never define sexism like that. I also don't see anything wrong with labeling sexual objectification as sexist, even less what it has to do with stereotyping. You call people christian and mormon like there is something wrong with it. Why would you call a progressive atheist a fundamentalist christian unless you are stereotyping? Go back to Close-Minded Prejudice Land! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
overthetop2 Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 you aren't "arguing" anything, you're just spouting nonsense along with your narrow minded opinion. That's what you're actually doing twit. I'm making a perfectly valid point about how the avatars on this forum are completely out of line. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 In your opinion they are out of line. Until Mike Tycoon says otherwise people are free to raunch it up to their hearts content and its not your place to tell them otherwise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iloveme8 Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 I'm making a perfectly valid point about how the avatars on this forum are completely out of line. An opinion, especially one based on morals, and more especially one in the overwhelming minority, is never "a valid point." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 An opinion, especially one based on morals, and more especially one in the overwhelming minority, is never "a valid point." Yeah, history has shown us that the majority is always right. Good point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.