Tracers Posted January 31, 2015 Author Report Share Posted January 31, 2015 Cool. has that name been used before? "Tycoon Quest" Will probably add something to it. Was undecided on a name but that looks pretty good will probably add something to it. You're the man Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shards Posted January 31, 2015 Report Share Posted January 31, 2015 People just have not to be blind and see if these stats show of any percentage of standup strikes or not. That's it They just gotta go 100% Follow my orders and don't swing for fences. Swing for fences vs Stick to gameplan: If your fighter is losing with X seconds to go, he will abandon his gameplan and just start swinging for the fences, looking for a knockout. If your fighter is on the ground, he can "swing for the fences" on the ground too... although it's a slightly inaccurate way of putting it, basically it just means he will look for a finish more than he would have done previously. I've never set a fighter not to strike at all so I've never ran into this issue but I assumed swing for the fences just increased his rate of activity, so with the current set up and swing for the fences the fighter would just try really hard for sub? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rain Posted January 31, 2015 Report Share Posted January 31, 2015 http://i.imgur.com/yJz98Tc.png 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rain Posted January 31, 2015 Report Share Posted January 31, 2015 Cool. has that name been used before? "Tycoon Quest" Will probably add something to it. Was undecided on a name but that looks pretty good will probably add something to it. You're the man Nope, it wasn't used yet Also added the belt to you Swing for fences vs Stick to gameplan: If your fighter is losing with X seconds to go, he will abandon his gameplan and just start swinging for the fences, looking for a knockout. If your fighter is on the ground, he can "swing for the fences" on the ground too... although it's a slightly inaccurate way of putting it, basically it just means he will look for a finish more than he would have done previously. I've never set a fighter not to strike at all so I've never ran into this issue but I assumed swing for the fences just increased his rate of activity, so with the current set up and swing for the fences the fighter would just try really hard for sub? I think swinging for fences just goes for very aggresive high damage blows 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tracers Posted January 31, 2015 Author Report Share Posted January 31, 2015 So swing for the fences is a no go for this, correct? thanks for all the feedback guys - you have all been great Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shards Posted January 31, 2015 Report Share Posted January 31, 2015 Without knowing more yea, it's likely a risk you wouldn't want to take - I was hopeful that it would consider the slider set up and only increase his activity in those areas but since that's not likely the case it's likely a good idea to avoid it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tracers Posted January 31, 2015 Author Report Share Posted January 31, 2015 So what's the consensus on GNP who wants it and who doesn't? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rain Posted January 31, 2015 Report Share Posted January 31, 2015 I want it We need it because without it Wrestling primary is not as effective, and it will also not allow fighters to max out that fast Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tracers Posted January 31, 2015 Author Report Share Posted January 31, 2015 I want it We need it because without it Wrestling primary is not as effective, and it will also not allow fighters to max out that fast I'm afraid this will remove some of the skill. Ala KO power coming into play .. Also like the concept of pure grappling. but it's up to you guys. Anyone else have opinions on this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tracers Posted January 31, 2015 Author Report Share Posted January 31, 2015 Added a poll feel free to vote. thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shards Posted January 31, 2015 Report Share Posted January 31, 2015 As I said in a pm you sent me, I'd be fine to see either, the pro to GnP is you make it a little different then the site run TWGC and it would help increase stoppages because pure GnP finishes and strikes being able to set up some subs. Would this org also be likely to offer a normal 3x5 round system or a more like a normal grappling 1x5/1x10? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavyJones Posted January 31, 2015 Report Share Posted January 31, 2015 I would create a fighter for this org for sure, my suggestion is to choose the 155lbs division and allow any fighter under that weight to join. Any fighters over those weights would start having too much of an advantage IMO. These were the rules for the last grappling org: RULES Judging: Whole Fight Fight In: Ring Special: No Strikes/GNP allowed SLIDERS 100% Follow my orders 100% Stick to gameplan (General) 100% Try takedowns 100% Counter Grapple 100% Go to ground (Clinch) 100% Stay on ground (Top) 100% Ground Subs (Top/Bottom) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tracers Posted January 31, 2015 Author Report Share Posted January 31, 2015 Added another poll option for rounds. Let's find out shards it's whatever you guys want Glad to hear davie. It is so awesome you guys are interested and getting involved. if you have any input feel free to post here or shoot me a PM in game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tracers Posted January 31, 2015 Author Report Share Posted January 31, 2015 Note: if you tick the ''other'' option please make sure to post what it's for to minimize confusion. thanks EDIT: Deleted the option to prevent people voting to add confusion. if you have a different vote for rounds feel free to share here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tracers Posted January 31, 2015 Author Report Share Posted January 31, 2015 Looks like if votes don't change drastically it will be no gnp and 1x5 1x10 rounds. Great feedback 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwang Posted February 1, 2015 Report Share Posted February 1, 2015 ^ oops I accidentally negged you, sorry! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shards Posted February 1, 2015 Report Share Posted February 1, 2015 ^ Fixed. Also I'd like to see a 260 or 255k restriction so you have a pool of fighters to hire but those of us(like myself) that are going to create for this won't be too far behind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 2, 2015 Report Share Posted February 2, 2015 I am interested, and have a fighter ready to join. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 2, 2015 Report Share Posted February 2, 2015 http://mmatycoon.com/fighterprofilemanager.php?FID=255729 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clydebankblitz Posted February 2, 2015 Report Share Posted February 2, 2015 Id be interested too but only with no GnP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tracers Posted February 2, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 2, 2015 Ok results are in. Looks like no gnp will be allowed sorry to those who wanted it. Thanks for all the feedback you all have been great. Will be starting the org ASAP so send me a PM with whom you want signed. Thanks Oh and if anyone wants to make a donation to help with contracts and to keep it alive feel free it would help out a lot. Obviously once it's established I will start making money and will be able to sign big contracts but until then a helping hand would be nice. Cheers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.J Posted February 2, 2015 Report Share Posted February 2, 2015 Sent some money.GL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavyJones Posted February 2, 2015 Report Share Posted February 2, 2015 What weight division and ID are you going to start with? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tracers Posted February 2, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 2, 2015 Sent some money.GL Great. you're the man if you come up with a fighter for the org let me know. @Davyjones undecided as of now possibly will go with shards idea. Right now I'm just trying to get some opinions. what would you like? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tracers Posted February 2, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 2, 2015 Added another poll to decide on which ID restriction this org will use. I added the option of hitting multiple choice so that if you would like to see both non restricted and restricted to be available. Keep the feedback coming I appreciate it a lot! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.