Jump to content

Guess Diaz isnt lying


toejam98

Recommended Posts

You cant have it both ways. Either i can what you think or i dont. Now you say i care than cry like a girl when i always tell you what you dont like to hear and remain steadfast in what i said regardless of the opposition. Yep, sounds like i care a lot! I won the gun debate. Anti gun people are losing their battle in the US and i still have my gun. Win/win. You guys can piss and moan about my mma logic and my lack of "love" for everyone who fights on tv. But my views works. You guys want to think i followed this sport for 17 years and dont know anything and you guys are always right. Yet when it comes to brass tax i have always picked fights correct more often than almost anyone. Won more money in this game and in real life than anyone i know. So yeah i think Tank has skill and GSp punches like a girl and these beliefs work out just fine. Keep thinking you know more than i do. Works out real well for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you ever thought that maybe other people follow the sport too? Just because you followed the sport for 17 years doesn't make you right.

 

 

Didnt say it does make me right. But at least im willing to put my opinion out there on fights to be tested. Unlike others who ride arguements thats cant be proven just so you have an out. So i put my pick out there for the Arlovski fight for all to see. Noone else picks Johnson in the thread who is a underdog by all sports books. While you guys cling to stupid shit like wether or not GSP has power just because you cant be proven right or wrong. So stay in the kiddie pool. Dont swim with the sharks! When someone deliberately clings to strawman arguements and refuse to prove they know what they are talking about. I think its safe to say i know much more than they do. Regardless if they like my opinion on their favorite fighter or fighters i like. I know what im talking about wether any of you admit it or not. Not that anyone has to be a MMA guru to make Toejam look like a noob.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't even understand how Johnson was an underdog. Arlovski is washed up and over rated at this point in my eyes.

 

And Brainsmasher, you just need to go away. You criticize someone saying their not credible and have never trained and blah blah blah but then someone criticizes you saying you're not credible you give your "do you think I care is if someone on the internet thinks I'm credible" speech. You're a complete idiot and 85% of the time you're wrong and don't know what you're talking about. Just like the Tank Abbott situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didnt say it does make me right. But at least im willing to put my opinion out there on fights to be tested. Unlike others who ride arguements thats cant be proven just so you have an out. So i put my pick out there for the Arlovski fight for all to see. Noone else picks Johnson in the thread who is a underdog by all sports books. While you guys cling to stupid shit like wether or not GSP has power just because you cant be proven right or wrong. So stay in the kiddie pool. Dont swim with the sharks! When someone deliberately clings to strawman arguements and refuse to prove they know what they are talking about. I think its safe to say i know much more than they do. Regardless if they like my opinion on their favorite fighter or fighters i like. I know what im talking about wether any of you admit it or not. Not that anyone has to be a MMA guru to make Toejam look like a noob.

 

Yea ok, your calling me a noob in a debate about MMA. Your a fucking idiot. First off you don't even know what point your arguing thats how stupid you are. I never argued GSP has KO Power, I actually said it multiple times that Im not arguing weather he has KO Power or not. I was arguing that what your saying was stupid. (That he fights the way he fights because he has no ko power otherwise he woulda finished guys) And it was stupid, theres way more possibilities that could factor into why he fights the way he fights, I just explained those. I never once said GSP HAS KO POWER. Your the one arguing to the bone that he doesn't, I was just explaining its impossible you to know. But its proven many times that you have the comprehension of a 2nd grade downsyndrome kid surviving off of life support. So doesn't suprise me you don't understand this.

 

BrainSmasher you dont know shit, 17 years and your still clueless. Maybe watch golf or something, maybe you can comprehend that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't even understand how Johnson was an underdog. Arlovski is washed up and over rated at this point in my eyes.

 

And Brainsmasher, you just need to go away. You criticize someone saying their not credible and have never trained and blah blah blah but then someone criticizes you saying you're not credible you give your "do you think I care is if someone on the internet thinks I'm credible" speech. You're a complete idiot and 85% of the time you're wrong and don't know what you're talking about. Just like the Tank Abbott situation.

He wasn't on the online bookies i put my bets on at, yet another thing brainsmasher was wrong about, i just didnt want another 1000 word essay saying im wrong.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He wasn't on the online bookies i put my bets on at, yet another thing brainsmasher was wrong about, i just didnt want another 1000 word essay saying im wrong.

Who you making bets with? Bums in the alley? This was the odds on all 12 Sportsbooks I have seen. Andrei Arlovski -120 -145 -145 -140 -135 -140 -120 -130 -135 -135 -130 -125 Anthony Johnson +110 +115 +115 +110 +115 +110 -110 +118 +105 +105 +105 +105

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You cant have it both ways. Either i can what you think or i dont. Now you say i care than cry like a girl when i always tell you what you dont like to hear and remain steadfast in what i said regardless of the opposition. Yep, sounds like i care a lot! I won the gun debate. Anti gun people are losing their battle in the US and i still have my gun. Win/win. You guys can piss and moan about my mma logic and my lack of "love" for everyone who fights on tv. But my views works. You guys want to think i followed this sport for 17 years and dont know anything and you guys are always right. Yet when it comes to brass tax i have always picked fights correct more often than almost anyone. Won more money in this game and in real life than anyone i know. So yeah i think Tank has skill and GSp punches like a girl and these beliefs work out just fine. Keep thinking you know more than i do. Works out real well for you.

No one was trying to take away your guns you ignorant redneck. How can you win a debate if you don't even know what is being debated?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one was trying to take away your guns you ignorant redneck. How can you win a debate if you don't even know what is being debated?

I started the thread dumbass. Don't tell me what the thread was about. I started it because people in this country are trying to take them away. hippies like you and the others were trying to argue all kinds of shits that isn't true. Anti gun nuts are losing because those ideas you have are not only wrong but illogical and fucking retarded. "Guns don't make you safer". Speak for your fucking self!

  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I started the thread dumbass. Don't tell me what the thread was about. I started it because people in this country are trying to take them away. hippies like you and the others were trying to argue all kinds of shits that isn't true. Anti gun nuts are losing because those ideas you have are not only wrong but illogical and fucking retarded. "Guns don't make you safer". Speak for your fucking self!

You are an idiot. The only one bringing up taking away all your guns was you. You are arguing a stance no one was taking. Same goes for in America. No one anywhere in our government proposed a single law to take away your guns. To debate anyone you have to know what the hell they are arguing in the 1st place. You were debating an imaginary invisible boogeyman. That is why you are such an idiot.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are an idiot. The only one bringing up taking away all your guns was you. You are arguing a stance no one was taking. Same goes for in America. No one anywhere in our government proposed a single law to take away your guns. To debate anyone you have to know what the hell they are arguing in the 1st place. You were debating an imaginary invisible boogeyman. That is why you are such an idiot.

I started the thread. If no one was arguing the reason I started it why was anyone replying and arguing in it? Yes there is laws that were trying to ban guns. Specifically Assault rifles. There was all kinds of crazy proposals in Colorado. NY has banned any gun that holds more than 7 rounds. Which is like 95% of brands. But you will go on and do what you retards did in the other thread. That is deny anything against your stance and make shit up that has no roots in reality. Also I wasn't arguing with a boogyman. I would state an opinion/rant not directed at anyone and you tools would quote it and argue against it. I wasn't starting an argument with you guys you specifically argued with me then claim no one is arguing against what I said. My comments were towards those who were trying to ban guns, and they do exist regardless of what you want to admit. You guys would take their side and defend it. Then claim you don't agree with that stance. lol

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just when I thought you couldn't get any more dense. There has not been a single law proposed to remove guns from anyone's possession who currently owns one legally. The assault weapons proposal was against new sales of very specific weapons. Not all or even most guns. No one is coming to your home, and no one in congress or the white house or that thread ever suggested they should. The laws that are actually being argued are mostly background checks and registration. Clip size as well, but even that is on the sales end. No one has ever been planning to come to your house and steal your guns. Only a moron would fall for that crap.

 

That thread lasted so long, because no one could get you to debate the same topic. They make one statement and you attack them for something completely different that wasn't even in their post, then it takes 3 pages of them explaining that fact before you do it to someone else and repeat it all over again.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just when I thought you couldn't get any more dense. There has not been a single law proposed to remove guns from anyone's possession who currently owns one legally. The assault weapons proposal was against new sales of very specific weapons. Not all or even most guns. No one is coming to your home, and no one in congress or the white house or that thread ever suggested they should. The laws that are actually being argued are mostly background checks and registration. Clip size as well, but even that is on the sales end. No one has ever been planning to come to your house and steal your guns. Only a moron would fall for that crap.

 

That thread lasted so long, because no one could get you to debate the same topic. They make one statement and you attack them for something completely different that wasn't even in their post, then it takes 3 pages of them explaining that fact before you do it to someone else and repeat it all over again.

I started the topic. If they were not talking about the same topic why was they on my thread? Maybe because they were the ones changing the subject and twisting shit? Bingo. Also since when was I talking about just federal law proposals? Keep twisting so you can feel you are right. There are more than Federal laws.
  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moral of the story; If you want to get a rise out of BrainSmasher, pretend you're Tank Abbott while playing with his zipper.

Same goes for you with any fighter who makes it on tv. You people idolize anyone who has the label of UFC fighter attached to their name. I sleep with a big smile on my face knowing if we both ran into Strange Brew fro TUF 1. I would walk right by him and you would stop and ask for his autograph like a teenage girl meeting Justin Bieber. I bet that lowers your testosterone 100 points. hahaha
  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I started the thread dumbass. Don't tell me what the thread was about. I started it because people in this country are trying to take them away. hippies like you and the others were trying to argue all kinds of shits that isn't true. Anti gun nuts are losing because those ideas you have are not only wrong but illogical and fucking retarded. "Guns don't make you safer". Speak for your fucking self!

 

post of the year. you managed to drag your other dumbness from a different thread...into a thread where youre also extremely dumb.

 

i love it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same goes for you with any fighter who makes it on tv. You people idolize anyone who has the label of UFC fighter attached to their name. I sleep with a big smile on my face knowing if we both ran into Strange Brew fro TUF 1. I would walk right by him and you would stop and ask for his autograph like a teenage girl meeting Justin Bieber. I bet that lowers your testosterone 100 points. hahaha

NM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...