BLOODSPORT Posted February 14 Report Share Posted February 14 Can someone maybe give explanation how i lost a round here? not complaining since i won the fight anyway... just trying to understand how judging happens here in mmatycoon for my improvement playing this game.. thank you https://mmatycoon.com/fightcommentary.php?FTID=1144618 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
venom09 Posted February 15 Report Share Posted February 15 Judging can be a little weird at times. Maybe on aggression? Reading through the round it looked to me like you had the edge through it but I've seen fights where one fighter threw more punches and landed more and lost somehow despite it being all standup. Doesn't usually happen, but there are times where it doesn't seem to add up compared to what the play by play and stats say. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carraz22 Posted February 15 Report Share Posted February 15 Sounds like they gave the other fighter round 3 which is weird. Does the game reward defence? He defended a few takedowns, sub attempts and had an escape? It shouldnt be rewarded but maybe they did? Or does the game have some random fuckery built in, every now and then we see a dodgy decision like in real life? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jersey Posted February 15 Report Share Posted February 15 13 minutes ago, Carraz22 said: Sounds like they gave the other fighter round 3 which is weird. Does the game reward defence? He defended a few takedowns, sub attempts and had an escape? It shouldnt be rewarded but maybe they did? Or does the game have some random fuckery built in, every now and then we see a dodgy decision like in real life? I think there is definitely random fuckery built in, otherwise every judge would score every round the exact same. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jersey Posted February 15 Report Share Posted February 15 I'd actually be interested if anyone ever took the time(I'm definitely not), to see if certain judges by name are the ones always dissenting, or if certain judges value different phases of combat/strikes differently. I wouldn't put it past this fight engine. There might be a Cecil Peoples in there that doesn't score leg kicks, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daudy Posted February 15 Report Share Posted February 15 20 minutes ago, Jersey said: I think there is definitely random fuckery built in, otherwise every judge would score every round the exact same. 100% there's some fuckery. I recently lost a split decision in a title fight that the commentator had me winning 3/5 rounds.... That's not too unusual, but what's unusual is that one judge had it 45-50 the other way. The blind bat scored every single round for them. Gun to the head scorecard. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daudy Posted February 15 Report Share Posted February 15 9 minutes ago, Jersey said: I'd actually be interested if anyone ever took the time(I'm definitely not), to see if certain judges by name are the ones always dissenting, or if certain judges value different phases of combat/strikes differently. I wouldn't put it past this fight engine. There might be a Cecil Peoples in there that doesn't score leg kicks, etc. While I think there is some noise/variation, I'd be shocked if it's as deep as specific judges. I think the judge names are just drawn from a specific pool per location. But in case it is, Chris Edwards from London, you're absolutely going to get it on sight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jersey Posted February 15 Report Share Posted February 15 9 minutes ago, Daudy said: While I think there is some noise/variation, I'd be shocked if it's as deep as specific judges. I think the judge names are just drawn from a specific pool per location. But in case it is, Chris Edwards from London, you're absolutely going to get it on sight. I agree and think it's unlikely, but I wouldn't be TOO surprised. Some of the judges names are based pretty closely on some of the worst judges of that time period haha. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curix Posted February 15 Report Share Posted February 15 Judges really sucks sometimes. That need to be changed, modified in a game a little bit or more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skuzbukit Posted February 15 Report Share Posted February 15 I think judges do make some dubious calls by design, makes it more realistic though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjsquirrel Posted February 15 Report Share Posted February 15 39 minutes ago, Skuzbukit said: I think judges do make some dubious calls by design, makes it more realistic though. I always thought that was the idea and I actually like having some randomness and bad decisions in there just like irl. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.